Diagnose me, oh Internet “doctors”/hate machines

The Atheist Cult are the most dangerous and deadly group on the planet. They are far worse than any mass murdering statesman ever was for no other group in the history of the world had the goal to exterminate all the decent people. For this, The Atheist Cult are by far the worst of all the groups in human existence. They’re like Stalin x1000. Unless they’re stopped their endgame will be a destruction of every single decent person on the planet.

They will do so in two ways

1. Feminism, which makes decent people incel. This will achieve two goals: a) it will make all decent people unable to reproduce b) it will make the strain of incel destroy many decent people

2. Bearing down the power of the state on decent people This will be achieved by criminalization and pathologization of all views held by decent people. There are already groups pushing for criticism of feminism to be illegal and in the US fields of psychology and psychiatry are almost completely held by liberals who will diagnose all sane, rational people as sick (for liberalism itself is a sickness).

For reasons mentioned in point 2 all TAC members adore psychology and psychiatry, seeing experts working in those areas as virtual gods. Or so it seems when you look at it at first.

However, taking a better look reveals a somewhat different story. I noticed one seemingly peculiar thing. I say seemingly because to me it is no great surprise at all. I know that The Atheist Cult are stupid manure incapable for even basic consistency and reason.

Though The Atheist Cult seem to worship a cult of therapy they don’t respect some very, very basic tenants of fields like psychology and psychiatry – like THE FACT THAT PEOPLE WHO AREN’T EXPERTS CAN’T DIAGNOSE OTHERS or THAT NOBODY, EXPERT OR NOT, CAN DIAGNOSE ONLINE.

Bear in mind, this isn’t name calling like “lunatic”. Some of this are detailed discussion about my potential diagnoses (mostly bullshit personality disorders, but there were people idiotic enough to claim I have schizophrenia) – all from people who aren’t psychiatrists and have never seen me in real life at all..
My question is – what gives you morons the right to do that? You’re not doctors and not even they can diagnose online.

So, why are TAC members doing this? What sense does it make?

Of course, the answer here is very simple – it makes no sense because TAC are fools. They lack any brains, discipline, honesty and any morals. They just like to call names without even thinking about what they’re doing. They are somewhat like a very immoral tribe which sometimes worships its gods and sometimes curses them and uses their names for nefarious purposes.

The goal of this is very simple – to dehumanize a person and nullify his or her words. It doesn’t matter if the person is saying the obvious truth or if even if the idiot making this fake diagnosing isn’t able to comprehend anything the person is saying at all. What matters is brutal, primitive attempt of negation.

My comment policy explicitly forbids diagnosing people on this blog (not to be confused with name calling like “Lunatic” or “Mental patient”, which is still allowed). Monsters doing this aren’t welcome on this blog, nor should they be welcome anywhere in society. They are dangerous and must be eradicated.

All this has a one very important consequence. As much as an year ago I merely disliked such monsters and still considered them people. After a year of witnessing all their filth and hatred I know that they’re not people but hate machines. Their incessant insults and strawmen, coupled with diagnosing I’m talking about here, made me hate them and see them as subhuman. But they are too stupid to understand that this is a consequence of their behavior, their stupidity and violence.

One can feel pity for a human being. TAC aren’t human beings but hate machines and are to be destroyed with no pity.

There can be no talk with TAC. Hate machines can’t talk. They are here to destroy you and will destroy you unless you shoot back.

About these ads

81 thoughts on “Diagnose me, oh Internet “doctors”/hate machines

  1. I think there is way too much emphasis placed upon ‘talking therapies’. As I have said in another post, psycho-babble is of little or no use when dealing with Incel / Loveshyness. I would recommend that any Incel / Loveshy guy observes what women do, NOT what they say. By doing so, a person so affected can learn how to get some DSR. By getting jacked and acting like a douchebag. You will get laid.

  2. thatincelblogger:
    Just read your TAC article; this is the first I’ve heard of it, but I agree, it makes lots of sense. We seem to agree; everyone believes in a god, whether themselves as a god, the god of psychiatry, or something else. Although I don’t know if you’d word it that way.

    On my website I attack psychiatry & psychology in chpt. 19. Witchdoctors Run Amok. I attack feminism in chpts. 31-32 Grrrl Power 1&2.

    Now why there is so much resistance to organized religion among incels and similar men? Since we probably won’t succeed in our goal (pardon my negativity), why not seek comfort in the belief in a personal God? (without that, I’d go crazy).

    The original Judeo-Christian construct was anti-feminist and upheld other conservative values; today we have a terrible distortion.

    Dmitry:
    It’s common knowledge that women prefer bad guys, jerks, and suchlike. They aren’t making rational decisions about mate selection. But they weren’t designed to do such; historically, women were given in marriage by their parents who were older and wiser.

    Me: http://www.wowedbytruth.com

    • KC

      You first heard of the term because I am the one who first started using it widely and described the characteristics of these monsters.

      Don’t think that therapy is the only thing TAC worships. They also worship feminism, therapy PC or certain sociological concepts like entitlement or patriarchy. Of course, they’re too stupid to adhere to these things in a disciplined fashion so they also mock therapists by diagnosing strangers online.

      I can’t make myself believe in a supernatural God. The idea just seems too unrealistic and honestly silly.

      But I would like to join a religion focused on morality, order and matchmaking of its members which doesn’t believe in a supernatural being or doesn’t add much importance to worship of such a being if it believes in it. fschmidt has some good ideas on this but it’s unlikely I’ll ever be able to live with him in US. Maybe you should try?

      As for your comment to Dmitry, I completely agree that women are too dumb to pick appropriate partners but this also applies for many young men.

  3. thatincelblogger:
    I also agree with you that many young men do a poor job of picking partners.

    Where I live, NOT believing in a supernatural God sounds unrealistic and silly. I live in the United States. What country do you live in?

    I will make absolutely zero attempts to connect with a woman for now. I quit working at 40 (autism and sleep disorder) and get a meager disability check. I must live with the folks for now.
    When they pass on I’ll have my own place and things will be different. Then I might seek a woman or I might not.

    Dmitry:
    I also identify bad guys as financial wolves who turn society into a greed-fest. Besides, people with lower intelligence have more children than people with higher intelligence here; our idiotic country finances it through welfare.

    And thank you for your comical straw man portrayals of my God. But you forgot the Flying Spaghetti Monster, Invisible Pink Unicorn, and Frosty the Snowman.

    • No. Certain types of autism and similar disorders such as Asperger’s syndrome strike 10 males for every 1 female. And either the woman’s disability is too severe for mating material, or too mild, so she cannot empathize.

  4. KC- it’s hardly important where I’m from. I also live in a country which is, at least nominally, quite religious. The point is, I would still surely be an atheist if I grew up under similar circumstances in the US. The only difference would have probably been that I would start calling myself a non-theist sooner because I would come into contact with horrors of liberal atheism sooner.

    However, TAC are much worse than any people believing in supernatural gods. There are many strong indications that gods don’t exist but we can never really know. On the other hand, concepts TAC worships religiously, like patriarchy, rape culture or wage gap have all been thoroughly debunked much more than a concept of supernatural god could ever be. So, TAC are actually much dumber and more irrational than any believers they like to rail against. TAC are members of the most violent and irrational religion in the world. I’d rather live in a most ardent theocracy than a TAC country, where psychiatry will be a tool to remove intelligent people, rape will be taken as seriously as stealing a chewing gum though it will be screamed about all the time and everybody will be an idiot. And there are already many countries that somewhat look like that.

  5. To be perfectly honest, many people who believe in God are nutty and idiots, just as many people who don’t believe in God are nutty and idiots.

    Also, many people who believe in God are intelligent and rational, just as many people who don’t believe in God are intelligent and rational.

    But as far as the God confusion, I simply believe that Jesus was God. If everyone followed His Golden Rule of treating others the way we’d want to be treated, the world would be a much better place. That shouldn’t be hard to understand; it’s not confusing.

    Also, believing in God helps comfort those in incel and other hard situations.

    Everybody will be atheist as long as they deify science. Science is great, but by electing science as the one and only measure of all things, we put ourselves in a box.

    • “To be perfectly honest, many people who believe in God are nutty and idiots, just as many people who don’t believe in God are nutty and idiots.

      Also, many people who believe in God are intelligent and rational, just as many people who don’t believe in God are intelligent and rational.”

      I agree with that.

      Both atheists and believers are in TAC. There are some very decent believers and some very bad TAC members like Liberal Jews or certain liberal protestants.

      “But as far as the God confusion, I simply believe that Jesus was God. If everyone followed His Golden Rule of treating others the way we’d want to be treated, the world would be a much better place. That shouldn’t be hard to understand; it’s not confusing.”

      Yeah, but did Jesus even exist? There’s not enough convincing evidence that he did, nor there is evidence that he performed miracles during his lifetime, let alone managed to be resurrected.

      “Also, believing in God helps comfort those in incel and other hard situations.”

      Well, these things can work two ways. It can be a comfort if your faith is strong but it can also turn you away from belief completely.

      This isn’t the case for me because I’ve been an atheist years before I became a teenager but I know many incels who have abandoned religion because of their incel. They simply couldn’t understand what kind of a god would allow them to suffer so much.

      I

      • As far as Jesus’ existence, there has been more written and documented about His life than all other historical characters combined. Besides the New Testament, there is a massive amount of extra-canonical writings. If we doubt Jesus’ existence, we must doubt the existence of all other historical characters.

        If Jesus did not rise from death, transform, and ascend heavenward, there would be a body.

        I agree with you that religion has been highly offensive to incels and others in tough situations. I’m deeply offended too!

        But here’s what I discovered: The Hebrew Bible or Old Testament or whatever people call it is where the offense is coming from. In it, God allegedly blesses men with wives, children, and wealth; the poor and singles are cursed. So now I ridicule and denounce these texts. I refute them and ignore them.

        But in the New Testament, the poor and singles are blessed and honored; Jesus was a celibate hero. So I promote the New Testament and other early Christian writings. Problem solved.

        • “As far as Jesus’ existence, there has been more written and documented about His life than all other historical characters combined. Besides the New Testament, there is a massive amount of extra-canonical writings. If we doubt Jesus’ existence, we must doubt the existence of all other historical characters.

          If Jesus did not rise from death, transform, and ascend heavenward, there would be a body.”

          Ok, now you’re just saying ludicrous stuff. A simple act of googling will show you that there the question of his existence is still contested. In any case, even if there was a prophet going by that name I don’t believe he was the son of God.

          To say that there are more reliable sources for existence of Jesus THAN ALL OTHER HISTORICAL CHARACTERS COMBINED is just…. umm, baffling?

          Are you actually claiming that there is more proof of Jesus existing than 20th century figures existing? That’s baffling.

          • A simple act of googling will also show that Earth is flat and boogers are a health food. You can google up anything you want. People deny that Jesus existed because it pricks their conscience.

            And NO NO NO NO NO NO NO ; I never said anything about 20th century figures who are still alive and have been videotaped.

            There is more documentation about the life of Jesus of Nazareth than ALL OTHER HISTORICAL FIGURES COMBINED. What is a historical figure? Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare, Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Ben Franklin, Hannibal, and a hundred others who we know existed *******because of written records and nothing else.*******

            We do seem to agree that there is a worldwide global conspiracy. I call it the Zio conspiracy (www.davidduke.com) while you call it TAC. They are probably the same people or often the same people.

    • KC: The “Golden Rule” of treat others how you want to be treated did not come from Jesus. It was around thousands of years before he was even born. It has also appeared seemingly independently in different cultures which had had little or no contact with each other.

      It is not Jesus’ Golden Rule, it is humanity’s.

  6. OP, the central thesis of your blog is that you have a psychiatric condition — specifically, a phobia — unrecognized by modern medical science.

    Anytime you make this claim, your readers (laypeople and doctors alike) will chime in with comparisons to other conditions that are recognized and documented. Like if I wrote: “I have these itchy red bumps on my arm, and a fever. Doctors in my third world country swear it’s not chicken pox. They haven’t tested for measles, but I’m pretty sure it’s not measles. I think it’s an unrecognized pathogen that this once scientist has speculated may exist” — and a reader responded: “Hey, Sympom X sounds a lot like what my brother had, and he had measles fyi.”

    That commenter isn’t “dehumanizing” you or acting on instructions from a liberal feminist atheist cult. Instead, that commenter is responding to me like a normal, reasonable human being.

    I agree that it’s infuriating and dismissive to have people brush off your arguments with inapposite thoughtless armchair diagnoses. But that’s not necessarily what people are doing when they advise that you talk to a qualified professional about autism/aspergers (for example). If the topic of your blog is psychiatric in nature, you can’t be too affronted when people discuss psychiatry in the comments section.

    • “OP, the central thesis of your blog is that you have a psychiatric condition — specifically, a phobia — unrecognized by modern medical science.”

      No. First of all, if you read the first part of the LS serial you’d know that I no longer have it – cured since 2011. My thesis is that this phobia was the main factor in making me incel before and since. Which isn’t even the central thesis of the blog, as I just mentioned it less than a month ago.

      “Anytime you make this claim, your readers (laypeople and doctors alike) will chime in with comparisons to other conditions that are recognized and documented. Like if I wrote: “I have these itchy red bumps on my arm, and a fever. Doctors in my third world country swear it’s not chicken pox. They haven’t tested for measles, but I’m pretty sure it’s not measles. I think it’s an unrecognized pathogen that this once scientist has speculated may exist” — and a reader responded: “Hey, Sympom X sounds a lot like what my brother had, and he had measles fyi.”

      That commenter isn’t “dehumanizing” you or acting on instructions from a liberal feminist atheist cult. Instead, that commenter is responding to me like a normal, reasonable human being.”

      I disagree completely. The issues that the kind of phobia love-shyness entails can’t really be compared to any other problem. What I’m describing is clearly not social phobia or any other problem to anybody but fools. What’s more important is that the diagnosing that infuriates me was rarely made after I talked about love-shyness. Yeah, there were a few cases when people said it’s social phobia but 99.9 percent of people diagnosing me weren’t relating to LS but just in general about what I might be having, months and months before I made a serious effort to explain love-shyness. So your comparison isn’t a good one.

      In other words, I am describing a disease where my skin goes blue and I start puking fire – those who tell me it’s measles are idiots.

      I agree that they act like normal human beings but disagree on the reasonable part. People are idiots.

      “I agree that it’s infuriating and dismissive to have people brush off your arguments with inapposite thoughtless armchair diagnoses. But that’s not necessarily what people are doing when they advise that you talk to a qualified professional about autism/aspergers (for example). If the topic of your blog is psychiatric in nature, you can’t be too affronted when people discuss psychiatry in the comments section.”

      The main topic of my blog is incel, which isn’t a psychiatric condition. In any case, I didn’t delete the comment that said that because it wasn’t diagnosing, it was recommending. Though the recommendation is extremely stupid because it asks me to basically try and make a psychiatrists give me a diagnosis by talking to me – diagnosing doesn’t work that way. If no shrink since 2003 diagnosed me with autism/aspergers maybe I just don’t have it.

      What’s also silly about autism/aspergers diagnoses is that they completely depend on the culture. They’re rarely diagnosed here but diagnosed all the time in the Anglosphere. That’s why psychiatry can’t really be compared to the rest of the medicine – you don’t diagnose things like cancers of heart disease based on culture.

  7. Dmitry,

    You suspect that my pastor, teacher, blah blah blah? I am the pastor, I am the teacher, it is EYE who has his own website that teaches others.

    And you’re dead wrong; the New Testament ABSOLUTELY teaches that Jesus was God. Type up Samuel Green and his one hundred incontrovertible reasons for the divinity of Christ from Scripture.

    But you did outsmart me since I have no idea where Nero’s or King David’s body is either. Ooooops! Nero was buried in a tomb on the Pincian Hill at the family burial place of the Domitii Ahenobarbi. And look up David’s tomb on Wikipedia.

    Let’s not challenge people on common knowledge that you can find on the Internet. I don’t want to look these things up when others could have looked them up. This irritates me and wastes my time.

    You have a million reasons for this that and the other? 1. is? 2. is? 999, 998 is? 999,999. is?
    1,000,000. is? List them. That must mean I have a billion reasons for whatever. Cheap spouting of hot air, which if continued, will fill an entire airship.

    And Jewish crap usually has little to do with the Golden Rule. It’s about butchering everybody who isn’t of the tribe of Israel. And anybody can say that they follow the Golden Rule daily; I’ve never met anyone who does.

    • Dmitry,
      Our conversation seems to be going nowhere. But I’ll defend and explain my position one more time; others readers may benefit from it.

      Again, there is more documentation about Jesus~Nazareth than all other historical figures combined.

      But then you put words into my mouth and straw-manned me; I never said Jesus was written about by many cultures. Why should He be? In ancient times, cultures were often segregated, unlike today’s multicultural mishmash. Jesus lived His life in a local area; He didn’t take airplane trips around the world. And naturally there’s little documentation by Romans and Jews; Jesus worked against their interests.

      Then you shoot at David Duke and Samuel Green (we may be talking about two different Sam Greens) by calling them crazy/insane. Any fool can use the ad hominem attack of calling people crazy. It’s not even an intelligent form of personal attack. Three year-olds do that. And let David Duke speak for himself; watch his videos on Youtube.

      EYE means you need to eye 500% more written material so you don’t make a fool of yourself by denying common knowledge.

      Nobody is sure about Nero and David’s bodies? They’re dead sure. Again, there is no body of Jesus, no burial site of Jesus, no tomb of Jesus, and history records that he transformed and ascended heavenward. The Jews and Romans were extremely hostile towards Jesus; if there was a body, they would have found it or a remnant of it in order to refute Christianity.

      My website: http://www.wowedbytruth.com

      • Dmitry,

        Your waiting is over; my job is done: Here’s THREE, not one as you asked. Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan AD 112, a reference in the Babylonian Talmud, and an account by Lucian. The exact references are found on Michael Gleghorn from Probe ministry’s website.

        Again, if you could’ve researched whether this information exists yourself, it makes you look foolish and annoys other people who must do your work.

        You have the wrong Samuel Green! Your Klan guy was born in 1890. The Samuel Green I’m referring to was born in 1792. The New Testament teaches that Jesus was God, period; over 100 reasons.

        You can’t compare Nero to Jesus. Nero was a butcher; Jesus had perfect character, Nero has no recorded miracles, Jesus has plenty, Nero is recorded as dying and not rising, Jesus is recorded as resurrecting and ascending.

        Knowledge of Christianity? The wellspring of Christian knowledge is found in the writings of the early Church fathers (besides the NT). That’s the original Christianity; everyone else deviates.

        For your THIRD MISTAKE IN ONE POST, you wrongly label me an evangelical. I’m confirmed Catholic; I go to Mass every week. (But I don’t contribute money to false teaching).

        Finally, I’m disgusted with American churches; they don’t follow the early Church. But what do Russian Orthodox bishops do besides grow beards? I was also involved in the Orthodox Church for 6 months, including a Russian parish.

        thatincelblogger: You have very intelligent things to say. But Flat-Earth “lunatics”? We can’t precisely define a lunatic like a house, car, or tree. More subjectivity, not objectivity. They’re simply in denial like most people, their denial is just different.

        • “thatincelblogger: You have very intelligent things to say. But Flat-Earth “lunatics”? We can’t precisely define a lunatic like a house, car, or tree. More subjectivity, not objectivity. They’re simply in denial like most people, their denial is just different.”

          Well, lunatic may be a strong word but it’s not far from truth about anybody who denies clearly proven scientific concepts.

          • I agree; flat-Earth-ism sounds extremely bizarre.

            But I dare say that one can believe that Earth is flat, believe that it’s square, or believe that it’s shaped like an ice cream cone and be a wonderful person.

            Likewise, someone can believe that Earth is round and be an expert in quantum physics, yet be a terrible rotten person.

            Science loves nobody, and science doesn’t address morality. But if there’s a God, and He became incarnate to address these things………………………………………….??

            • Correct, it’s a crutch. But a crutch is something real and legitimate. In my case, religion is a motorized wheelchair, LOL

              Stupider, hairier ancestors, eh? Like Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Copernicus and those devout Christians?

              And your contributions to science are what? Enlighten us.

    • A good post, Dmitry. I will remove you from moderation now. Anyway, KC, I really see no point in arguing the issue anymore.

      It’s a commonly known fact that the existence of Jesus is still an unresolved issue. Check http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/

      The two examples about googling flat Earth or boogers being a healthy food just backfired. Looking at these results in a couple of different versions all showed me that 1. the flat Earth theory is wrong and held by some lunatics 2. that one guy believes in boogers being healthy, it’s not like it’s common knowledge.

      The main reason, in my mind, that Jesus’ tomb location isn’t known, if he existed at all, is because he was a obscure. It’s a far more realistic explanation than him getting out of a grave.

      Did Jesus Christ exist as the kind of prophet we imagine him to be? Maybe, but he sure as hell didn’t resurrect people or turn water into wine.

      Edit -also, ffs, we don’t yet know where’s the grave of a much more recent Genghis Khan and Tamerlane wasn’t exhumed until 20th century.

  8. Thatincelblogger:
    I have been following you for a few weeks now and I think I have a good understanding of your difficulties and the ongoing turmoil in your life. I am not one of those “online diagnosticians” because you have already firmly identified your main issue.

    You probably already know that the government will not intervene in this, so that leaves you to either suffer, or to use prostitutes to eradicate your involuntary celibacy. Millions of men across the world use this solution and it is even called the world’s oldest profession, yet you seem unwilling to use their services. Is it a question of enough money? A distaste for prostitutes? This is something I would like to clearly understand. Because if it’s not a question of the money or the prostitute, then it is surely something else keeping you stuck where you are.

    In that case, what alternatives do you have? I understand you are vehemently opposed to therapy but is there some other professional you could see? If we assume that things that you have already tried will not work for you, what other suggestions do you have? I am seriously just trying to understand. If it is a relationship, and not just sex that you want, then you already know the answer lies within yourself and anger and frustration must be set aside so that you can work on it. I know you think you have tried everything, but there must be more. A counselor rather than a therapist? They have different qualifications and different methods.

    Hoping to understand more.

    • “You probably already know that the government will not intervene in this, so that leaves you to either suffer, or to use prostitutes to eradicate your involuntary celibacy. Millions of men across the world use this solution and it is even called the world’s oldest profession, yet you seem unwilling to use their services. Is it a question of enough money? A distaste for prostitutes? This is something I would like to clearly understand. Because if it’s not a question of the money or the prostitute, then it is surely something else keeping you stuck where you are.”

      I understand that the government won’t intervene. I’ve stopped talking about that and changed my nickname back in October.

      However, your idea that prostitutes are somehow the solution… Dude/dudette, that is Tumblr feminist level of misandry. Are you saying that men are satisfied with occasionally paying for sex, without even having the gratification of unpaid sex, let alone a relationship? C’mon… Seriously? How the fuck are prostitutes a solution?

      As for me and prostitutes, I don’t have the money to hire one but even if I did I doubt I would because I find sex overpriced. A good escort that providers more than sex is another story but that’s even more expensive.

      “In that case, what alternatives do you have? I understand you are vehemently opposed to therapy but is there some other professional you could see? If we assume that things that you have already tried will not work for you, what other suggestions do you have? I am seriously just trying to understand. If it is a relationship, and not just sex that you want, then you already know the answer lies within yourself and anger and frustration must be set aside so that you can work on it. I know you think you have tried everything, but there must be more. A counselor rather than a therapist? They have different qualifications and different methods.”

      I am not vehemently opposed to all therapy. I even think some incels should try it if they can’t handle the depression. But it’s more of a band-aid, not a solution because it’s only natural to become depressed if you’re incel.

      “In that case, what alternatives do you have? I understand you are vehemently opposed to therapy but is there some other professional you could see? If we assume that things that you have already tried will not work for you, what other suggestions do you have? I am seriously just trying to understand. If it is a relationship, and not just sex that you want, then you already know the answer lies within yourself and anger and frustration must be set aside so that you can work on it. I know you think you have tried everything, but there must be more. A counselor rather than a therapist? They have different qualifications and different methods.
      Hoping to understand more.”

      I don’t know what to tell you, really. I am the one hoping to understand more. How do I put my anger and frustration aside and “work on it”? I will be angry and frustrated as long as I lack success.

  9. Pat R,its not a question about getting laid.Hooker cant provide you with affection and understanding like a girlfriend.Technically,after a hooker you are not a virgin but you remain incel…

  10. I think the question asked by Pat R. is quite interesting. You seem to put some emphasis on being logical, so perhaps applying logic to your situation would be helpful.
    1. No government will ever institute a policy of this nature.
    2. You seek emotional fulfillment, not just physical satisfaction, hence, no prostitution.
    3. For whatever reason, your persona is such that women are not willing to enter into a relationship with you.
    So that is where you are in your life. Perhaps writing this blog helps, perhaps it also allows you to keep running in one place without ever moving forward.
    Why not try and formulate a future in which other things take the place of this idealized relationship you seek? Many, many people live without romantic love (and many people in relationships are not especially happy). There are so many other things in life which can offer satisfaction…work, volunteering, art, travel, etc. Why not try some of these things and let this obsession go for a bit? You never know. As you broaden your horizons and become a more complete person, you might find yourself better able to connect with other humans, including women.

  11. “The Atheist Cult are the most dangerous and deadly group on the planet. They are far worse than any mass murdering statesman ever was for no other group in the history of the world had the goal to exterminate all the decent people.”

    I’ve been down this road with you before, so I’m not gonna have this argument yet again. But the above statement is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard.

    And KC Sunbeam, you’re a shit-brained Nazi tool. No true Christian would follow the word of an Olympic-level scumbag like David Duke.

    K, that’s all. Bye.

    • TV:
      Everything you ever heard about DD comes from the Christian-hating radical left-wing liberal biased media; everything you heard is false. And we have zero to do with Nazis. Please take your own advice and stop watching the idiot box so much.

      • Dmitry,
        Now now, I gave you three additional non-Christian sources that talked about Jesus Christ. 1) Pliny mentioned to Trajan that Christian believed that Jesus was a god at an early date before elaborate legends would have developed. 2) The Talmud has MANY references to Jesus. They call him Baalam or something; the name Jesus in Hebrew is Joshua like their ancient hero Joshua, hence the name change. 3) You just admitted Lucian’s reference to Jesus.

        NOW PAY CLOSE ATTENTION: History may lack long detailed accounts by non-Christians about Jesus. HERE’s WHY:
        A) In order to give a long detailed account, you’d probably have to know Jesus extremely well.

        B) But if you knew Jesus extremely well, and discovered that He had a perfect character, forsook women and worldly goods, his mother told you that His was a virgin birth, saw that He fulfilled prophecy exactly, did numerous miracles, and claimed to be God, you would be compelled to believe that He was God.

        C) But if you believed that He’s God, than by definition, you would be a Christian believer. D) But if you were a Christian believer, you couldn’t write a long, detailed account of His life (see point A).

        I think you’re basically saying “Show me people who believe in shapes with three sides but don’t believe in triangles.” If you set up an illogical, impossible, or heads I win tails you lose standard, then you trap yourself in a prison of your own making.

        Kent Ham and Clerk Bovine??? Who the heck are they? How about your buddies Joe Turkey and Clark Kent? What about Frank Salami and Peter Parker?

        How is my belief different from Mohammed cutting the moon in half? Could it be that the moon is one sphere in the sky, not two halves? Duh. And Norse beliefs are completely obsolete, while Christian beliefs are worldwide; see the difference?

        And where in the world do you get the idea that Catholics don’t believe that Jesus was God?

        And show me a quote by the early Church fathers that they believed in the death penalty for eating shellfish, wearing mixed fibers, or even sodomy. You’re confusing them with the Jewish law. Again, more mistakes.

        • Dmitry,
          Samuel Green’s 100 incontrovertible reasons for believing in Christ’s divinity from NT Scripture: http://www.wholesomewords.org/etexts/green/deityofchrist.html

          Nice try w the Duke pictures. The one on the right shows him as a teenager, while he is in his sixties today. His intention was to use shock value to get attention for his cause, he was NEVER a neo-Nazi nor a member of the Nazi party. The Nazis were National Socialists; DD was a Republican member of the House of Representatives.

          DD regrets his teenage antics; don’t you see the difference between teenage behavior and older adult behavior? What if I held up your baby pictures, and said that’s Dmitry for you; going around wearing nothing but a diaper and sucking a pacifier? People mature.

          The one on the left is him as a Klansman. Klansmen are not Nazis! Some Klansmen think that Hitler was a scumbag (as did David Duke), while others admire Hitler. But let’s say that you admire a woman. Does that mean you want to be a woman? Ridiculous.

          You keep grasping at straws; I wonder when you’re going to run out of straws and embrace the Lord Christ. He loves you and He is waiting.

          • You spent a good deal? I spent 16 years just to create my book and get it on the Internet.

            You’d want to shit on the chessboard too, if some clown kept insisting that because you can’t move your Rooks diagonally and your Bishops horizontally, that he is the winner.

            Non-Christians wouldn’t likely write a biography of Christ any more than people who don’t like sports would write a football player’s bio. Common sense.

            Know so little of Christianity? The early Church Fathers are the whole ball of wax basically. If you “know more”, you’re making shit up.

            And your neo-Darwinism is an embarrassment. See my Chapter 4: Monkey Business.

            So we have a Russian (or Ukrainian?) guy who’s an expert on an American institution? Hardly. Blacks murder, rape, rob, and beat the brains out of tens of thousands of Whites every single year. Then they leach off welfare, deal dope, and contribute nothing.

            The Kyklos Klan was absolutely heroic; absolute heroes.

            Most Americans are cowards who act like disposable douche hoses; they hate the Klan because the Klan would rescue them from getting their rumps roasted. Self-hating freaks; unbelievable. I’d leave America if I could.

            How about we ship all the Blacks to your area; a dozen of them can live in your house. I eagerly await that day. The Blacks love you; they are waiting.

            • Dmitry,

              I’m being misunderstood! I’m saying that YOU insist that I move my Rooks diagonally and my Bishops horizontally. No can do. You talk about complicated strategy, but you want to play without the King (Jesus Christ is King of Kings). And say you have the White pieces and several Black pieces are on your side of the board. What do you think is happening, a love-fest of diversity? I’m a 1600 Elo player (average club playing strength is 1500).

              It’s not my job to make scientists quake in their boots; that’s God’s job at the end of the world. And no, Evolution is not biology, neither is it science. If somebody is “observing” Evolution, they are on LSD.

              Then you bring up the same sad nonsense about “poverty causes crime.” The Black poverty rate is only 2X the White Rate. But their crime rate towards their own race is 7X the White on White rate. And the Black on White rate is 25X the White on Black rate. The Black crime rate is probably much higher because political correctness lets them off. That’s reality.

              You can’t compare Eastern bloc countries that are in the midst of collapsing to the United States. Of course it’s not Blacks killing Whites; you don’t have large Black populations. And the Jews (the Green race), most of whom are atheists are behind most of the mayhem. They are responsible for the Russian Revolution for example.

              The Klan is disbanded and disgraced because Jews completely run our government and completely run our media. They pump their propaganda every single day, keeping our citizens brainwashed. Jews hate the Klan and Jews hate Christians and Christianity.

              The Klan is capable of doing nothing now because most people are brainwashed cowards who won’t support any White Pride organization. America is better for it? What planet are you from? Yup, men can now marry other men; praise the Lord. America is going down the toilet with Obama as President.

              OKAY, LET’S TRADE: I ship you all our Blacks and you ship me all your impoverished uneducated Whites. Most of your Whites will prosper in America after they get out from under the Communist boot.

              And yes, you have racism, always had. It’s the Jews (Green race) or TAC verses Gentile Whites. That’s why we need racial segregation.

    • “I’ve been down this road with you before, so I’m not gonna have this argument yet again. But the above statement is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard.”

      That’s correct, we’ve talked about this before and you just ignored my explanation. I told you already that TAC are creating a third holocaust through feminism, which creates incel. The target of this holocaust aren’t minorities like Jews but decent people.

  12. To everyone who may be reading this blog:

    Dear readers,

    I don’t think it’s appropriate to debate Creationism/Evolution on a blog; it’s far too difficult and complicated a subject for the format. If you’re interested in debates over this issue, perhaps you can find copies of full debates on the Internet.

    Unfortunately, Creationism has been dominated by those who demand a literal interpretation of the Genesis account. I however regard Genesis as fiction; I’m simply here to promote Divine Design. If you simply understand the many huge gross holes in Evolution that they don’t teach in schools, we should understand why the alternative is so beautiful and sensible.

    Concerning the different races, I believe that we should apply the Golden Rule to everyone. But race-mixing has led to the destruction of society. It is the source of untold pain. Birds of a feather flocking together usually works best. A foreign bird in another bird’s nest is there to destroy the eggs. If God wanted the races to inter-mate and create one composite race, He would have created only one race to begin with. Instead, He created multiple races on different parts of Earth.

    Even if you reject Creationism and embrace Evolution, then they evolved on different parts of Earth for a reason; race-mixing would then be spitting in the face of Evolution. The racialist David Duke takes this position. David Duke is extremely intelligent and educated; he has multiple doctorates. Please find him on the Internet.

    Furthermore, I’m endlessly hit with false information because my opponents fail to do their research. I don’t have time to do their work for them. The latest examples are: I’m called a maroon. Maroon is a dark red. I like the entire red family of colors: standard red, maroon, brick red, magenta, and especially pink and baby pink. But I am of the White race.

    I’m challenged on things like: “Irregardless isn’t a word.” Yes it is a word. Although it doesn’t appear in standard dictionaries, it appears in my unabridged dictionary. It is an exasperated form of the word regardless; when someone wants to drive home the point of something being regardless, they may use it. When I type irregardless, I don’t get a red underlined spell check as when typing errors occur. I have a doctorate level vocabulary.

    So irregardless of popular belief, I have the truth. Please check out my book Wowed by Truth; exploding our notions of humanity and God. http://www.wowedbytruth.com Have a nice day/evening everyone.

  13. I will not be intimidated by the Zeitgeist (unholy ghost), I have the Holy Ghost. Therefore, any and all of your appeals to popularity aren’t worth the powder it takes to blow them away with.

    Call it evo devo or whatever; get technical about homo sapiens sapiens not homo sapien; you have the same giant holes and the same problems.

    Because of your comments on black holes, I will alter that section somewhat. What I wrote was a theory at the time. The theories keep changing. But nothing supports time travel nor defeats thermodynamics. What’s next, will you deny the existence of gravity?

    There is no fourth dimension, no space time continuum, no Twilight Zone, and no time other than the mathematical formula of “time”!!! Billions of years cannot help you, only hurt you.

    Viruses are not a go-between between life and non-life; they are a complex mechanism. Then you contradict yourself by saying that there are no higher and lower life forms. So then you’re no better than a worm I suppose.

    GIVE ONE EXAMPLE of one species evolving into another. Your evo devo, boogie woogie, or whatever is not science! It’s not observable, unless on LSD.

    If I’m making up phony statistics against Blacks, may I burn in hell. You however, have nothing to lose by distorting statistics. Why don’t you move to Detroit and find out the hard way?

    So poverty causes rape???????!!!!!!!!!! That’s what you’re saying.

    And education doesn’t eliminate crime. Criminals were generally of lower intelligence to begin with, so they chose crime over education. Upstanding citizens were generally of higher intelligence to begin with, so they chose education over crime. Intelligence is genetically-based; different races have different intelligence levels.

    I don’t hate anybody; you don’t know me at all; complete ignorance of my personality and thinking patterns. And what am I prideful about?????

    Ask the Palestinians about the Zio conspiracy; wake up. And if I’m fantasizing, then thatincelblogger would be too. The people from his TAC conspiracy sound like the same people from the Zio conspiracy.

    In America, people slam religion as an excuse to promote feminism and homosexuality.

    And the existence of FREE WILL proves the existence of the supernatural. Think about it, sleep on it.

    • KC, I don’t see TAC as a conspiracy. It’s not a movement of any kind, just a name of people sharing various common characteristics. There are some exclusively TAC communities like Freethoughtblogs, Rational Wiki or feminist sites but they don’t form a coherent movement or a conspiracy.

      • Thanks for the clarification. I myself reject all notions of different groups of people conspiring together. But one group of people are united to conspire together; Jewish racial supremacists. They are the true racists and haters. It seems like many of them are also TAC.

          • I wouldn’t say that TAC are mostly Liberal Jews, but I would say that Liberal Jews are mostly TAC. What you call TAC originated from Protestantism and then spread to Judaism causing Liberal Judaism.

            Unfortunately Judaism is generally racist with no real difference between Liberal Judaism and Orthodox Judaism in this respect. This is unfortunate because the Bible itself is not racist at all. The problem here is the Talmud. I personally support a non-Talmudic, non-racist version of Judaism based on the Bible. RAMZPAUL’s last video is a good explanation of the racial hypocrisy of Liberal Judaism.

            • Franklin,

              Excellent video!

              thatincelblogger,

              In Israel the racial supremacists are probably mostly Orthodox. But in America, the Zio supremacists are mostly liberal.

              But I agree with Franklin, it’s a lot more complicated than that. And to add what Franklin says about the Talmud: The Talmud has Jesus Christ boiling in a barrel of human waste for all eternity.

              Members of the Zio conspiracy have undermined Christian White values by promoting phony psychiatry and psychology, pornography, and comedians mock Christianity on TV. And the major feminist women were anti-religious with a Jewish background.

              They also do everything in their power to promote race mixing between Blacks and Whites (divide and conquer), and make racial separatists look evil.

              One of the most successful countries is Japan; highest average IQ, cleanest country, greatest life expectancy, etc. They don’t race mix; they’re about 100% Japanese.

  14. Show us your seven additional dimensions. They’re like your wormholes; theoretical only. That’s neither science nor religion.

    Viruses have to be a complex mechanism since they must have a fully functional reproductive system. And viruses have DNA molecules, do they not? So there!

    And the hominids were all Homos. A Homo is a Homo is a Homo. It’s not an ape, it’s not a monkey, it’s not a lizard. If we replaced a lot of people today with Neanderthals, we’d get an improvement. Again, MACRO-Evolution is fake; it’s not observable unless on LSD.

    And the designation Homo sapiens sapiens is so distorted and biased that it should be rejected completely. There are three major sub-species of Homo sapiens: Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. This was proven and documented before those who were pimping political correctness threw it out.

    And you are distorting what I’m saying about race and crime. Humanity is fallen; there will always be crime, not a crime-free paradise. But with racial separatism, the crime rates will be LOWER. And Europe hasn’t been of one race for ages. The pernicious influence of many Jews (Green Race) caused problems for Whites. Before that, the problem was that the White barbarians lacked Christian influence. And in Dmitry-land, poverty causes rape.

    And NO; saying Zion conspiracy doesn’t make sense. Zion is not conspiring. Zion can be the physical city of Jerusalem or a spiritual realization. It’s the Zio conspiracy; this was coined by Dr. David Duke.

    Then there’s an insult against mentally handicapped people. So who’s the backwards hillbilly?

    I would be boiling mad, but I know that God will eventually destroy His enemies and mine. Therefore I’m laughing.

    • I might read that book, but I’m way way behind in my work of editing MY book. Even if your author proved his case, that will never apply to us. We live in a natural world of three dimensions. Then there’s the supernatural. We will never time travel. We will never escape the laws of thermodynamics. And I don’t plan on falling into your Twilight Zone anytime soon.

      You’re evading the issue: Viruses have DNA molecules and reproductive systems, do they not?

      The other “hominids” are either Gorilla, Pan, or Pongo, apes are never Homo. So stop trying to distort the issue. And we are not apes. And there’s no link between Austrolapithecus and Homos. I said that the nonexistent missing link would be Chaka from Land of the Lost.

      The terms Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid are not “sloppy.” They are imprecise as you pointed out and complained about. But then you offer Homo sapiens sapiens which is much more imprecise because it lumps everybody on Earth all together. So you completely contradict yourself!

      Good, you seems to agree on cultural separatism. Is this so? But you must understand that culture originates from race. There are also sub-races; different cultures originate from different sub-races. There are also micro-races (a word I’ve coined). You might call them family clans.

      Zio is simply an abbreviation of Zionist.

      I need my autism. Otherwise I wouldn’t be dealing with you on a blog thread that only half a dozen people are reading. I’d be on television or something.

      And I repeat myself: My standard is the New Testament and the early Church Fathers. You’re referring to the Old Testament which I take little stock in. It was separate and apart from the New Testament for a whopping 1,200 years.

  15. K C Sunbeam, we agree on a lot, but of course we follow different books since I follow the Old Testament. But one critical disagreement I have with you is that I think race originates from culture, not the other way around as you say.

    Looking through this thread, I also see you said “And Jewish crap usually has little to do with the Golden Rule. It’s about butchering everybody who isn’t of the tribe of Israel.” This is wrong on a few levels. First, the Golden Rule doesn’t state who the “others” are, whether they are other members of your tribe or all of humanity. And second, Hillel did state the Golden Rule (in the negative form) before Jesus as recorded in the Talmud.

    I’m reluctant to address Dmitry at all since what he says is so absurd. I am not Christian, but the idea that Jesus didn’t exist and was just invented defies common sense. Dmitry has the usual superficial understanding of science common to Modernists, but with no real understanding of the implications. Knowing the number of dimensions postulated by string theory doesn’t really mean much, especially when string theory barely qualifies as science since it is so hard to experimentally falsify. Reading more, I see that Dmitry lives in Israel. Let me guess, Tel Aviv.

    • Franklin,
      I’m sorry if I’ve offended you per your Jewish heritage. I’m sure that you have a healthy love for your heritage as I love mine.

      Maybe I shouldn’t have said “Jewish crap”. But here’s what irks me: Throughout the Hebrew Bible, people whom God loves are blessed with a spouse and children. Those who fail to mate and reproduce are cursed. The Hebrew Bible has been used as a club to bash me over the head on this. I’m closer to 50 than 40, and I’ve never been in a long term relationship with a female, even though I was married (with her for 6 weeks). It’s impossible for me to ever have a family; impossible.

      Per Hispanic women, I worked in a company that was 90% Mexican and Mexican-owned for seven years. Most were women. None of them ever showed any attraction to me whatsoever; several showed irritation. Of all the women that have had any attraction to me throughout my entire life were full Gentile White. Non-white men taking White women cuts off the chances for many.

      I’m very certain that culture originates from race or sub-race. According to Dr. David Duke, biology will always win out.

      Although the Golden Rule doesn’t state who the “others” are, Jesus instituted the concept of a universal chosen people through faith, instead of a chosen people through tribalism. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, He taught to apply the Golden Rule to whomever we come across. I understand that there were converts to Judaism long ago, but these were exceptions to the general rule of Jewish racial lineage. Perhaps they were especially attractive women, which caused the leaders to break the rule. And even if the Golden Rule was stated in the Talmud, I’m going to keep quiet about that for obvious reasons.

      You have Dmitry confused with thatincelblogger as far as the existence of Jesus.
      Dmitry strikes me as a typical atheist. If I was an atheist I would do the same thing. How else could I escape the brutally obvious implications of the laws of thermodynamics, the huge obvious gaps between life forms, and the simple fact that free will proves the existence of the supernatural? I would do so much twisting and squirming that I would qualify as a plate of spaghetti.

      • K C Sunbeam, I have no love for my ethnicity. As I keep saying, what matters to me is culture. I love the cultural ideas found in the Bible. I grew up in a liberal Jewish environment and I hated those people.

        As a man, you can still have children at your age. An investor I follow, Jim Rogers, first had children at age 60. If you prefer white women, I suggest you look in Russia.

        I assume the Mexican women in your company came from the lower classes in Mexico. The lower classes in most societies have a somewhat different culture from the rest of the society. Americans generally don’t understand Mexico because they have no exposure to the Mexican middle and upper classes because these classes don’t come to America often. One of my business partners was from the Mexican upper class. And my wife is from the Mexican upper class.

        “Jesus instituted the concept of a universal chosen people through faith, instead of a chosen people through tribalism.”

        There is no conflict here because a tribe is based on values, not ethnicity. Jesus simply started the Christian tribe.

        “In the parable of the Good Samaritan, He taught to apply the Golden Rule to whomever we come across.”

        I am always amazed at how Christians interpret this because this is not what Luke 10 says. Jesus compares 3 cases and says “Which of these three do you think proved to be a neighbor”. Jesus’s answer is not all 3, but rather just the man who helped him. And the point of the question is based on Jesus saying “Love … your neighbor as yourself”. (This comes right from the Torah, Leviticus 19:18.) So who must one apply the Golden Rule to? Luke 10 says that one must apply it to those who would also help you, not to everyone.

        “I understand that there were converts to Judaism long ago, but these were exceptions to the general rule of Jewish racial lineage.”

        There is no rule in the Bible of Jewish racial lineage. I challenge you to find one. The closest you will find is Deuteronomy 7:3-4 which says “Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, because they will turn your sons away from Me to worship other gods.” But here “them” means other cultures, and this is clear by the reasoning here, that this will make the children worship other gods. This reasoning is clearly cultural/religious, not racial. When the Israelites left Egypt, they had many other races with them. (I can find the reference if you want.) These races easily assimilated. Moses himself married a non-Israelite. And the book of Ruth makes clear how easy it was to convert, even for a Moabite which was probably the most despised tribe by the Israelites.

        • Franklin,
          Certainly you can throw away your dignity and get married and have children past 60. That also helps your wife be happy since you will die before long, and she will get your money. And 90% of the enjoyment of sex is gone, so you won’t bother her with that too much. Yes, anyone can be a sucker and a damn fool.

          And yes, I’ve come across “upper class” Mexican women. Instead of worshiping babies, they worship money. No love no matter what.

          The Hebrew Bible causes pain: God loved and blessed people with doting spouses and many children. Those without were cursed. So I’m the ultimate bastard who should have been aborted. OR………………………..could the Hebrew Bible be toilet paper? Yup, it’s toilet paper.

          Okay, Luke 10 says to apply the Golden Rule only to those who help you. But that could be anyone. In your Hebrew Bible, those outside Israel were supposedly totally evil; they were to be utterly killed, robbed, or enslaved. This was the general rule.

          Per Jewish racial lineage, I do know that they were 100% white. People can twist the texts and say that Moses and those guys reproduced with black women. But this can be dis-proven through genetic profiling.

    • Science has implications. Would you want to cross a bridge that was designed by someone who didn’t believe that science has implications? The implications science go beyond engineering and include ethics because science, particularly evolution, tells us how a population may change depending on the (social) environment.

      • Franklin,
        I regret my derogatory remarks about the Hebrew Bible. It’s just my frustration at its being used as a weapon. Even with proper use, it hurts people, and you hurt people by supporting its idea that men with wives and children are blessed and those without are not.

        There are always exceptions in it, but its general rules are obvious. It’s certainly not a perfect standard as you claimed. Your considering it such reveals your cultural bias whether you realize it or not.

        Although we may never fully agree, can you at least realize that for many men, MGTOW is the only way? Can you realize that many men have severe mental handicaps, physical handicaps, poverty, or personality variations that make MGTOW an imperative?

        You have high intelligence and a powerful presence on the Internet. You can either hurt people or help make them feel good. Please prayerfully consider this.

        • K C Sunbeam,

          Thanks for your comment. But I don’t think the Hebrew Bible ever says that those without children aren’t blessed. All it really does is to encourage children, which I think makes sense. I would rather see good people having children than bad people having children. Don’t you agree?

          I also never claimed that the Hebrew Bible is perfect. There is evidence, like the Dead Sea Scrolls, that the Hebrew Bible was modified over time, which means that it can’t be perfect. But it is my favorite book, so I follow it.

          MGTOW means a lot more than not having kids. It is a label for a group of men that I don’t like very much. I much prefer your Christian outlook to the typical MGTOW outlook.

          I am not much of a presence on the internet. I have to focus on getting my life in order and then work on having an impact outside the internet.

          As I think we discussed earlier (it’s hard to track things here), I think the most impact that one can have is in a real physical religious community and I hope you find a Christian community where you can have an impact. Christians and non-Christians can’t effectively belong to the same religious community, but we can be allies and help each other. Here is one example of some advice I offered a Christian. I hope all anti-Modernist religions help each other figure out how to defeat our common enemy.

          • Franklin,
            You cannot compare yourself to famous entertainers, then conclude a poor Internet presence. Concerning intellectual minds you have a strong presence.

            The Hebrew Bible never makes a direct statement that single men without children aren’t blessed (besides the prophet Jeremiah), but its implications are obvious.

            Damn straight “good people” (nobody is truly good) should multiply and crap-heads should be curtailed. I go further: they should be spayed and neutered.

            Yes you claimed the Hebrew Bible is a perfect standard. I could search this blog’s posts. If I fail to find it, it means it was erased, not that I’m wrong. I remember that clearly.

            I know piss poor little about MGTOW; it’s news to me. But man, straight guys (except homeless bums who want my money) were deeply offending me. I have one good friend Jeff who identifies as gay. He’s angry at them because they were mistreating him; he remains celibate.

            We agree: the Christian community and the Jewish community both suck.

            I looked at your advice to a Christian: Excellent. But people would rather drown in the Modernist toilet because they’re too frikin lazy; it would require too much effort to stand for old fashioned values. Honestly, I see no hope.

            • Ah, the old wife’s tale that people long ago only lived to 30 (or 40 or 25 or rather you obviously don’t know) raises its ugly head once more. The book The Long History of Old Age might help you. Dozens of spinster’s tales falsely support Modernism.

              Per Evolution, you’re very welcome to believe it. I don’t want to get in anybody’s way on this point if that’s what gives them happiness. If that’s what floats your boat, hooray for you. Just don’t use it as an excuse to hide behind and escape morality.

              Crap-heads: Those who are criminal-prone, those who won’t work and leech off welfare, those who won’t discipline their children or teach them fine values.

              • I’m woefully ignorant of information that has only one purpose: To eliminate God and spit in the face of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Most of your knowledge is designed to do just that; it lacks practical value.

                You’re a brain, I grant you that. But one can be incredibly intelligent and incredibly foolish, having no wisdom whatsoever.

                Everyone who has a major physical or mental handicap should be allowed to be exempt from work and get a sizable disability check. But those who are too bleeping lazy and those who crank out babies should be punished severely.

                Fine values: Practical historical Christian values.

                And what species are you evolving into? A mature adult I hope.

  16. Dmitry,
    You are not able to squirm out of the fact that viruses and one-celled organisms are extremely complex mechanisms. The ability of viruses to hijack the systems of other organisms before they can reproduce makes them even more complex, not less. With the huge gap between non-living matter and the simplest life forms, Evolution is disproved and Atheism is disproved.

    And I’ve just proved the existence of the supernatural in two words: FREE WILL.

    We spend too much time arguing about classification. Ultimately, screw classification. If you don’t know the difference between apes and people, extreme shame on you.

    If you don’t know the difference between Blacks in Africa and European Whites, then extreme shame on you. Blacks have produced a grand total of 0~zero~0 successful civilizations throughout world history. Yes, integrating at a snail’s pace reduces tensions. But it still wipes out successful cultures.

    Jesus referenced the Old Testament hundreds of times because he was dealing with those who lived by it. By not showcasing it, He might have been completely rejected. The Jewish religious leaders certainly didn’t think He took great stock in it; just the opposite. They had him killed because they felt that He was trying to do away with it.

    • Dmitry,

      Do you know the purpose of studying science? It is to bring joy into people’s lives by helping
      them to understand the wonders around them. It’s especially for harnessing scientific principles so as to improve the quality of human life.

      Richard Dawkins prostitutes science by using it to try to destroy religious faith. Without religious faith, the disenfranchised among us, such as Mikey, suffer greatly.

      Yes, religion is a crutch, and a very important one at that. Science is also supposed to be a crutch. For example, science was used to help create artificial limbs for handicapped people.

      Instead, people like Dawkins make science into a bloody whore to give themselves grossly swollen egos and to derive pleasure in cutting down others. Dawkins and his ilk can have all the intelligence in the world, but they lack wisdom; they are fools. And they are sadists. Therefore their books would be of much better use to be recycled into toilet paper.

      And your self-replicating entities simpler than extremely complex one-celled life forms are non-functional outside a lab with scientists injecting their human intervention into them. They naturally croak via the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. So all that’s meaningless.

      To me Yahweh doesn’t accurately represent my God; he’s God from a Jewish perspective. I wouldn’t want to disprove Vishnu per se; he has many similarities with the Christian God. The Hindus are making progress towards monotheism. If they removed the Indian slant of the Vishnu concept, we’d almost have the Christian God. And Thor was a good idea for illiterate people who lived 5,000 years ago. If you and I lived back then, we’d believe in Thor too.

      As far as blacks, I’m talking Negroes. In the closest city to where I live, they travel in packs of ten to twenty. If you go there, maybe they can beat the sociology mumbo jumbo out of you. Your sociology has no value.

      Supernatural simply means above the natural. It is not proved through science, it is proved through logic. And if you deny that we have free will, then extreme shame on you.

      The Old Testament: 2,000 years ago there were no books. “The Old Testament” of today was around 50 different separate scrolls. Jesus never said that He quoted the Old Testament, Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh. He said that He quoted the prophet Isaiah, Jeremiah, or Daniel. There’s much truth in some writings, but falsehood in others. Jesus never said that He endorsed the whole thing and He never said that all of it was God-authored. So He didn’t lie or deceive. Jesus told His followers to believe in Him, not believe in the Bible.

      Jesus was not the king of the Jews, nor did He proclaim such. Although others also claimed to be the Messiah, they came to nothing while Jesus proved His case.

      To incels I offer comfort; Jesus was the ultimate MGTOW man. To upstanding citizens my racialism offers public safety. WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO OFFER??????????????????

      Think about it, sleep on it.

      • My “extreme weirdness” blows apart your notion that everything is only natural. According to your bigoted mind, nothing whatsoever could possibly be either weird or normal.

        They are all only a chemical process stemming from your big bang; you postulate an endless domino effect of atoms hitting atoms hitting atoms hitting atoms. Talk about repeat.

        According to you, I’m only typing to a flesh robot, the result of complex chemical processes. Maybe that’s all you are. But I, with my uniqueness, fly like an eagle high above your Dark Age thinking.

        Oh yes, it is you who are stuck in the past; you’re concerned about old fossils that have nothing to do with how we live today. But you deny that there are different subspecies of people living today.

        Your blasting me with ad hominem attacks and straw man attacks doesn’t help your case. Insinuating that I believe in a flat earth or deny that photons fly; what kind of crap is that? Your attacks are merely a smokescreen to hide the fact that you’re utterly trapped by the FREE WILL (obviously supernatural) argument.

        If you continue that argument, you will be like a man standing inside a giant vice while he twists the handle to squash himself.

        However, you are right, society will continue to leave me behind. And God will leave them behind, the last shall be first per Scripture. I’m patient; I’m laughing and waiting.

          • You can pick the topic. I agree with thatincelblogger and K C Sunbeam on most subjects. And since I am religious, according to you I should be a poor debater and you should beat me easily.

        • *******Warning******* Straw Man attacks up ahead *******Warning******* Falling bullshit

          I DO NOT believe that the Bible is God-authored; 0%, nor believe that it’s God-breathed. He didn’t breathe on it, cough on it, or sneeze on it. I completely reject the Genesis account of Creation. My beliefs are documented in chapter 18) Is God a Paperback Writer?

          I purposely designed my Creation/Evolution chapter to have zero Bible references. Yet you continue with Ken Ham. Unless you’re going to send a bacon cheeseburger, no more ham!!!!!!!!

          Ad hominems that contradict: I must be a poor little depressing slob/ I must be a pompous arrogant ass. Being pompous and arrogant about being a poor little slob????? You’re failing to read me. Read my chapter Communication Breakdown.

          Archeology is good; my father wanted to be an archeologist. I’m simply saying that it’s not as valuable as studying subjects that have more bearing on modern life.

          Caps lock: Some caps lock makes it easier to read than no caps lock. Criticize all caps lock but stop criticizing some caps lock.

          Black people: I had a black minister as a Protestant; we have a black priest. I hate that blacks murder, rape, and rob tens of thousands of whites every year. I hate that blacks leech off welfare and trash our cities. I hate the BEHAVIOR, not the people, not the skin color. Ignorance of race differences=death.

          Muslims, Jews, Mormons, Jehovah Witness, Hindu, Norsemen, etc.: None of those groups focus on ultimate unity with God in a supernatural loving relationship as Jesus originally taught. They are little more than physical, I’m promoting the spiritual.

          Natural=the physical world of atoms, molecules, photons, etc. Supernatural=above and beyond the natural world; not subject to natural laws, yet able to impact the natural world.

          The Free Will argument destroys what you’re saying. You’re saying (?) that the universe started with a natural (?) explosion of matter, then evolved in an unbroken 14 billion year chain of cause and effect reactions, are you not? Then we would be locked into that chemical chain; there would be no free will. Free will would be outside the natural chain; it would be supernatural. Perhaps men with white coats should take away those who deny that we have free will to the booby hatch.

          • Okay, let’s both be perfectly honest. What you’re saying about race, crime, and poverty may be completely true where you live. But what I’m saying about race, crime, and poverty is completely true where I live. I wouldn’t lie to you.

            I live in the United States, a vast territory of 300 million; a “melting pot” of White, Black, Hispanic, a little Asian, Indian, and Native American. Our country is controlled by the ZOG (Zionist Organized Government).

            I’m right! (but I’m not saying you’re wrong). What country do you live in? I’m not trying to hide anything from you. I use a screen name for two reasons: My real name sounds stupid, like Bumblebutt Dork, and there are nuts out there who might wish me harm.

            So Science Is The Measure of All Things? But you can’t prove scientifically that science truly is the measure of all things; that in itself is a philosophical statement. If you could discover God in a laboratory, he couldn’t be an infinite, omnipotent God. He would be subject to rotting, as everything physical is.

            I’m saying that you cannot act deterministically without free will.

            Yes, all organic life can act in opposition to its environment to maintain equilibrium. But this could be the result of free will, or simply natural causes, such as a pinwheel with alternating blue and red petals alternately stopping with either one or the other at the top.

            Humans certainly have free will. I also postulate that higher animals have free will; they also will answer to God for how they lived their lives; although God’s expectations for them will be much lower.

            But no, bacteria, seeds, ants, etc. undoubtedly lack free will; they are no more than flesh robots.

            Correct, nothing in our brains violates causality or the general flow of events in the universe. But our spirits (each human has a spirit residing within them) can (free will). Plus: no free will=no morality.

  17. “If I had to pick a topic, I would prefer one that I am familiar with: religious creation versus evolution (or, rather, science vs religion).”

    dmitry, excellent topic. First note that different religions have different ideas about creation. Some may take Genesis literally and others don’t. I follow the Old Testament and the Old Testament never claims that all of the stories there should be taken literally. The core point of the Old Testament is to teach morality, not science. However, it turns out that science supports the morality of the Old Testament and conflicts with modern secular morality. So the topic here really is which does science support, the Old Testament or modern culture? For my answer, please read Human Evolution. Then we can debate.

    • Pardon my butting in, but I don’t think the point will be made otherwise.

      Various European countries are the best in some ways not because of their high rate of atheism, but because of the race of their people. Different races have different genetic predispositions for either success or failure. That’s science; that’s biology; yet you kiss the rear of political correctness in this area; why?

      And the big factor in wars is race, not religion. Religious people have done a hundred times more to help others than non-religious people; creating hospitals for example.

    • Thanks dmitry, your reply is long so will respond point by point as I read it.

      My claim isn’t that the Old Testament endorses evolution, but rather that evolution endorses the Old Testament.

      I don’t think I used the term “natural selection” at all. The reason is that this doesn’t play much of a role these days in human evolution. The reproductive rate is much more significant, unfortunately.

      The original source of genetic diversity may be mutation, but evolution isn’t dependent on mutation in the short run. There is enough diversity to work with and virtually an infinite number of combinations to try.

      When I say that the Old Testament is in line with evolution, I am talking about the part of the Old Testament that actually matters, meaning the moral teachings. Criticizing the “factual” aspects of allegories is inherently absurd. The Old Testament took surrounding myths of the time and modified them to be morally sound.

      It is no surprise that you prefer morality of the New Testament because your religion, modern secularism, is a mutant deviant offshoot of Christianity. What you call the atrocities of the Old Testament, I fully support. These “atrocities” make perfect evolutionary sense and your views conflict with evolution. I believe that your culture, modern culture, must eventually be slaughtered because they will not leave other cultures in peace as long as they live. The Old Testament is not hostile to all other cultures, only to immoral cultures. Consider Jeremiah 35 where God praises the Rechabites over the Israelites, even though they don’t worship God, because they are more moral and more loyal to their traditions.

      “The ultimate injustice is the visiting of the consequences of the fathers’ sins upon his sons. To me this is the absolute mirror image of justice.”

      I have to quote this verbatim because here you show how you miss the whole point. The Torah commands not punish people for their relative’s crimes. So why does God do this? Because God is the force for morality, not morality itself, and a very large component of God is evolution. What is being described in your quote is simply evolution at work at a cultural level. When the fathers ruin society by behaving immorally, the repercussions tend to fall on future generations. Your quote above is describing a fundamental truth expressed in God’s name that modern culture can’t accept, but will suffer the consequences of.

      I do not consider “the Renaissance, Enlightenment and the eventual revolutions of national freedom” to be aspects of modern culture. Modern culture began in the late 1800s as a deviant form of Christianity. Modern culture is fundamentally hostile to the values of the Enlightenment. Our current comfort is a legacy of the past. The sins of modern culture will destroy future comfort. Why? Because the consequences of the fathers’ sins falls on future generations. You may not like this but it is truth.

      • Yes natural selection plays a role. But going back to your earlier point, I don’t think I use “evolution” and the concept of natural selection interchangeably. I recognize natural selection as just one component of evolution.

        I find your distinguishing of race and culture odd. You seem to be making the same mistake that racists make. Race is simply the product of culture, which is why racism is absurd. Race is the end product, while culture is the means. One should focus on the means and forget about race. Culture itself is influenced by various things INCLUDING evolution itself. If the population of a culture evolves toward having a greater disposition for certain behavior, then that behavior will become more common in that culture. This is why reproductive rates absolutely matter for culture. For more, see the movie Idiocracy.

        Regarding mutation, mutation plays a much larger role in the evolution of asexual reproducing organisms like bacteria than it does for sexual reproducing organisms where recombination plays the biggest role. I am not denying the mutation is needed to produce genetic diversity, I am just saying that it plays little role in the short run in human evolution, and by short run I mean that it plays virtually no role in a time period of less than 10,000 years.

        Regarding my non-literal interpretation of the Old Testament, what probably “threw” you is that you are used to debating Christians. I have nothing against Christians, but one needs to recognize that Christianity is based on faith while my religion, Judaism, is not. This doesn’t mean that I am not religious, it just means that my religion emphasizes different things, in particular behavior. If you are interested in understanding this more deeply, I recommend reading The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture.

        Regarding modern culture being a deviant offshoot of Christianity, please read The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture.

        The story of the slaughter of the Amorites is in Joshua. The book of Joshua is fascinating and would require a long post to explain, and I have stopped writing long posts because no one reads them. In summary, Joshua was a Israelite Hitler, a homicidal maniac who violated virtually every law in the Torah. The book itself is intentionally written on 2 levels, one for simpletons and one for people with understanding. Remember that the Bible is basically a textbook on morality. The Torah is meant to lay down the basic principles, and the rest of the Bible is meant for analysis on whatever level one is mentally capable of analyzing. I realize this short paragraph is insufficient to really answer your question, but if you are interested, I can write an article on Joshua next shabbat. So basically, yes the slaughter of the Amorites was unjustified, but it turned out to be necessary given the limitations of the people at that time.

        In your comments about the United States, you are evaluating the country based on your own values, those of modern culture, which America shares, so of course you approve. I am reading an interesting book right now called Antifragile where the author criticizes the modern nation-state as being fragile because it cannot tolerate cultural diversity within its borders. He compares this to empires of the past that conquered other nations but didn’t insist on destroying their culture. Not mentioned in the book, but even Islam respected other cultures more than modern culture does in that it allowed other religions to run their own affairs within a Muslim empire. The core problem of the United States and all of modern culture is the complete lack of cultural tolerance for other cultures. Modern culture will ridicule, legislate, or use whatever means possible to destroy other cultures. Modern culture is one of the few cultures in history that is fundamentally incapable of respecting other cultures.

        When I use the word “immoral”, you compare me to Ayatollah Khamenei. That well illustrates the limited perspective of modern culture.

        Yes morality is subjective. But I think everything is subjective including truth. So calling something subjective hardly lessens its importance in my eyes. After all, importance itself is subjective.

        What determines my subjective preferences? My taste in food was determined by evolution, to favor those foods good for my health. Similarly, my taste in morality is hopefully based on what moral system would be best for my genes. And I have no doubt that modern culture is disastrous for my genes. Modern culture selects the stupid and immoral, traits I lack. As someone with integrity, my genes can only prosper in a culture that selects for people like me and strengthens us through cooperation. The culture of the Old Testament does exactly that.

        Just to be clear, I consider God to be very real but I define God differently than most. For a full explanation, see Skepticism.

        Regarding “rigid adherence to archaic moral standards”, I don’t see how moral standards can ever be archaic since human nature has not significantly changed. Rather I think your thinking is a narrow-minded product of your times. The Romans ridiculed the Christians as adhering to an archaic religion based on an ancient religion even at that time (Judaism). And look what happened. But I do agree that rigidity as a bad thing. One should take eternal moral principles and apply them in a flexible way to one’s present circumstance. This is why I like the Old Testament but I don’t like the Talmud, which is why my sympathy is with Karaite Judaism.

        “The pursuit of knowledge, the concept of respected (but limited) personal freedoms, individualism, secular institutions designed for the welfare of the citizenry; these are all Enlightenment traits that survive to varying degrees today, which no brand of religion would ever dream of endorsing.”

        All of these Enlightenment traits came directly out of Protestantism. This is another long topic, but related to this is my post The Enlightenment Is Over.

        • The principles of the Torah were designed by an Egyptian intellectual, Moses, for primitive slaves. This is exactly why they are universal, because they aren’t targeted at a developed culture. Now of course I disagree with your high opinion of the average Westerner. I consider the average Westerner no more intelligent or educated than anyone else in history. The only thing unusual about the average Westerner is the vast size of his ego.

          Regarding tolerance, you confuse multiculturalism with true tolerance. Multiculturalism is nothing more than a means of destroying cultures by blending them together, sort of like make fruit punch instead of respecting the flavor of each fruit. The right to vote and run for office is totally worthless for a minority culture. What really matters for a minority culture is the right to govern their own affairs. In the Roman Empire and most empires in history, the conquered nations were left culturally intact and were generally governed by their own members as long as they stayed within the empire and payed taxes. Under Islam, each religion was allowed to govern its own members. This is much more autonomy and respect for minority religions than the West now practices. The closest example in the West today is the Hasidic Jewish communities in America, but they are in constant conflict with Western law. For example, the Hasidic Jews would like to run a private bus line with buses segregated by sex, but they are not legally allowed to do this. Western (liberal feminist) law prevents other cultures from living according their principles.

          Your examples of economic trade are irrelevant to culture.

          You just see the world with your Modernist blinders on. I see reality. I have been banned from virtually every forum run by members of modern culture, easily 100 forums. Why do you think you found me here? Because thatincelblogger rejects modern culture, which allows him to be tolerant. I have also generally found tolerance on Orthodox Jewish and Muslim forums. I even posted a Nazi forum as a Jew and found them more tolerant than members of modern culture. In my experience, no people are so intolerant to other viewpoints as members of modern culture.

          I don’t know how to respond to your paragraph that mentions the Palestinian and Israeli villages because it makes no sense. The Palestinians and Israelis have an unfortunate conflict over land. The issue isn’t morality. The biggest problem in this conflict is that most Israelis are too influenced by modern culture to see the correct solution, which is basically the Islamic solution of allowing Muslims to live in Israel as a separate class of citizen.

          An Old Testament culture would allow me to prosper, but not at the expense of others who don’t attack my culture. Unlike your culture, my culture doesn’t insist on shoving its values down everyone’s throats, but it does insist on defending itself against outside attacks.

          And yes I do deny that Enlightenment values are common today. I see modern culture as being much more like medieval Catholicism than like the Enlightenment. Again I refer to my post The Enlightenment Is Over.

          • Pardon me while I interrupt your debate (although you two guys wouldn’t be having this debate without my intellect getting the ball rolling to begin with).

            I’m against what thatincellblogger typed to you. However, why are you on an incel blog if you’re married? Are you here just to taunt and antagonize incels? Letting off steam from a difficult marriage?

            And guess what promotes rape? Your race-mixing. No, I wouldn’t like the racism in your area; their integration causes the problem. But with segregation, TA- DA! no more race conflict.

            Your advice to incels is worthless and so is Franklin’s.

            The True Advice: Watch MGTOW videos; become MGTOW. Get spirituality (free will proves spirituality, along with the dozen giant holes in Evolution which elephants could walk through). TA- DA!!!

            Even if spirituality was only fairy tales, it would be a million times better than your depressing ideas which you attempt to foist upon incels, handicapped people, the poor, and other disadvantaged folks. You attempt to rape our hopes into a bloody mess.

            Franklin/Dmitry: I have ideas on how to improve society as well. In chapter 36.Cheerio, I have a 100 point plan on how to vastly improve and restructure America, and ultimately the world. I just did a major revision on it.

          • dmitry, I will try to explain.

            I admit not to being tolerant towards those I call TAC. I want all of them dead, yes. But I want that because I believe their ideas are so harmful that they will destroy the civilization. However, don’t fool yourself into thinking that they are any more tolerant than I am. In fact, they want an even worse destiny for me than I want for them. You see, I just want them executed. They want to lock people like fschmidt and me up forever and drug us. This is because liberalism is actually a form of Marxism, a form of Erklärung – they believe we can be treated into “health”, aka treated into becoming liberals.

            You mention me saying that about your wife but you don’t mention your own statements, which were much more monstrous, like comparing incel to a lack of… what was it? A car? You have no idea how sickening that is?

            When Franklin talks about previous times he doesn’t say that all things from the past should be returned. But it is obvious that female suffrage is destroying the civilization so it should be repealed. So your ramblings on the Middle Ages are redundant.

            Also, obviously Franklin and myself don’t think that the West is advancing but declining. It resembles medieval Catholicism because it is violent and intolerant towards those who don’t fit the dogma, just like medieval Catholicism. Franklin and myself have received thousands of insults due to nothing but espousing our ideas. Whoever doesn’t fit the TAC ideology is declared insane and there are attempts to remove him/her from society.

  18. Yeah I’ll debate with you Dmitry you prick. You tell us why you think you have the right to pick fights with people. Incel guys need t do just ONE thing. Stop treating women with respect. They do not deserve it. My days of kissing female ass are fucking OVER. As of now, some bitch disrespects me, and I will slap the bitch stupid. Any white knight tries to get all macho with me, and they will end up on with one of my knives in their guts. That is what Incel has done to me.

  19. There are some men who are so fucked up they cannot get laid no matter how hard they try, guys who are severely deformed or retarded perhaps but these guys are few and far between. edited for breaking the rules and warned There are so many sluts out there who will fuck anyone and some of these sluts are hot, so Even if you are fat and ugly etc. if you approach enough women you can get laid, even by hot women if you are fussy about looks. You must be brainwashed by the idea that only “alpha males” can get laid idea that you read online.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s